Home / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3: cost per task

Kimi K3 is cheaper on 11 of 14 tasks and about 2.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Claude Fable 5.1 has the higher LMArena Text score (1502 vs 1487).

TaskClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K3Difference
Answer a chat question6.3¢1.6¢3.9x
Reply to a customer email2.0¢4.2¢2.1x
Write a 1,500-word blog post18¢9.2¢2.0x
Write 10 product descriptions22¢3.7¢6.0x
Translate 1,000 words13¢14¢1.1x
Proofread one page (500 words)5.6¢4.9¢1.1x
Summarize a 20-page PDF22¢3.0¢7.5x
Extract data from an invoice5.2¢3.2¢1.6x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet85¢13¢6.7x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)14¢3.9¢3.5x
Classify 100 support tickets4.5¢8.8¢2.0x
Review 500 lines of code40¢11¢3.6x
Write a SQL query5.5¢3.8¢1.5x
Run a 50-step coding agent$3.46$2.241.5x

Specs and list prices

Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K3
Input per 1M$10.00$0.30
Output per 1M$50.00$11.94
Cached input per 1M$0.25$0.21
Context1M1M
Providers426
Reasoningalwaysdefault
LMArena Text15021487
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Jul 16, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3 cheaper?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on 11 of 14 tasks and about 2.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Claude Fable 5.1 has the higher LMArena Text score (1502 vs 1487).

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 cost compared to Kimi K3 per token?

Claude Fable 5.1: $10.00 input and $50.00 output per 1M tokens. Kimi K3: $0.30 input and $11.94 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.