Home / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 49.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskClaude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question6.3¢0.08¢83.0x
Reply to a customer email2.0¢0.04¢53.6x
Write a 1,500-word blog post18¢0.75¢24.3x
Write 10 product descriptions22¢0.76¢29.2x
Translate 1,000 words13¢0.08¢155.7x
Proofread one page (500 words)5.6¢0.10¢56.9x
Summarize a 20-page PDF22¢0.32¢69.4x
Extract data from an invoice5.2¢0.11¢46.9x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet85¢0.85¢100.8x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)14¢0.19¢71.1x
Classify 100 support tickets4.5¢0.42¢10.7x
Review 500 lines of code40¢0.83¢48.3x
Write a SQL query5.5¢0.13¢43.3x
Run a 50-step coding agent$3.469.2¢37.5x

Specs and list prices

Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$10.00$0.15
Output per 1M$50.00$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.25$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers42
Reasoningalwaysnone
LMArena Text1502-
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 49.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

Claude Fable 5.1: $10.00 input and $50.00 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.