Home / Compare / Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: cost per task

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 1.9x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.07¢0.09¢1.4x
Reply to a customer email0.04¢0.03¢1.2x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.19¢0.04¢4.3x
Write 10 product descriptions0.21¢0.04¢5.1x
Translate 1,000 words0.13¢0.18¢1.4x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.07¢0.04¢1.6x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.22¢0.12¢1.8x
Extract data from an invoice0.06¢0.04¢1.4x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.85¢0.26¢3.2x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.14¢0.08¢1.8x
Classify 100 support tickets0.09¢0.08¢1.2x
Review 500 lines of code0.66¢0.26¢2.5x
Write a SQL query0.08¢0.03¢2.7x
Run a 50-step coding agent6.6¢2.4¢2.8x

Specs and list prices

Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input per 1M$0.10$0.072
Output per 1M$0.50$0.14
Cached input per 1M$0.01$0.002
Context1M1M
Providers1034
Reasoningdefaultdefault
LMArena Text-1475
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Sep 10, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 1.9x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Claude Haiku 5.5 cost compared to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash per token?

Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.