Home / Compare / Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 1.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.07¢0.08¢1.2x
Reply to a customer email0.04¢0.04¢1.0x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.19¢0.75¢4.0x
Write 10 product descriptions0.21¢0.76¢3.6x
Translate 1,000 words0.13¢0.08¢1.5x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.07¢0.10¢1.4x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.22¢0.32¢1.5x
Extract data from an invoice0.06¢0.11¢1.7x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.85¢0.85¢1.0x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.14¢0.19¢1.3x
Classify 100 support tickets0.09¢0.42¢4.5x
Review 500 lines of code0.66¢0.83¢1.2x
Write a SQL query0.08¢0.13¢1.5x
Run a 50-step coding agent6.6¢9.2¢1.4x

Specs and list prices

Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.10$0.15
Output per 1M$0.50$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.01$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers102
Reasoningdefaultnone
LMArena Text--
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 1.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Claude Haiku 5.5 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.