Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: cost per task
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 59.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Claude Opus 5.5 has the higher LMArena Text score (1508 vs 1475).
| Task | Claude Opus 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer a chat question | 2.5¢ | 0.09¢ | 27.7x |
| Reply to a customer email | 0.79¢ | 0.03¢ | 26.1x |
| Write a 1,500-word blog post | 7.3¢ | 0.04¢ | 165.0x |
| Write 10 product descriptions | 8.8¢ | 0.04¢ | 214.0x |
| Translate 1,000 words | 5.1¢ | 0.18¢ | 28.6x |
| Proofread one page (500 words) | 2.2¢ | 0.04¢ | 51.6x |
| Summarize a 20-page PDF | 8.9¢ | 0.12¢ | 73.0x |
| Extract data from an invoice | 2.1¢ | 0.04¢ | 46.4x |
| Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet | 34¢ | 0.26¢ | 129.0x |
| Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG) | 5.5¢ | 0.08¢ | 67.8x |
| Classify 100 support tickets | 1.8¢ | 0.08¢ | 22.2x |
| Review 500 lines of code | 16¢ | 0.26¢ | 60.1x |
| Write a SQL query | 2.2¢ | 0.03¢ | 69.0x |
| Run a 50-step coding agent | $1.68 | 2.4¢ | 70.0x |
Specs and list prices
| Claude Opus 5.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input per 1M | $4.00 | $0.072 |
| Output per 1M | $20.00 | $0.14 |
| Cached input per 1M | $0.20 | $0.002 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 11 | 34 |
| Reasoning | always | default |
| LMArena Text | 1508 | 1475 |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 10, 2026 |
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 59.6x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Claude Opus 5.5 has the higher LMArena Text score (1508 vs 1475).
How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost compared to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash per token?
Claude Opus 5.5: $4.00 input and $20.00 output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.