Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 20.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean).
| Task | Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3.8 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer a chat question | 2.5¢ | 0.08¢ | 33.2x |
| Reply to a customer email | 0.79¢ | 0.04¢ | 21.4x |
| Write a 1,500-word blog post | 7.3¢ | 0.75¢ | 9.7x |
| Write 10 product descriptions | 8.8¢ | 0.76¢ | 11.7x |
| Translate 1,000 words | 5.1¢ | 0.08¢ | 62.3x |
| Proofread one page (500 words) | 2.2¢ | 0.10¢ | 22.7x |
| Summarize a 20-page PDF | 8.9¢ | 0.32¢ | 27.8x |
| Extract data from an invoice | 2.1¢ | 0.11¢ | 18.8x |
| Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet | 34¢ | 0.85¢ | 40.3x |
| Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG) | 5.5¢ | 0.19¢ | 28.5x |
| Classify 100 support tickets | 1.8¢ | 0.42¢ | 4.3x |
| Review 500 lines of code | 16¢ | 0.83¢ | 19.3x |
| Write a SQL query | 2.2¢ | 0.13¢ | 17.3x |
| Run a 50-step coding agent | $1.68 | 9.2¢ | 18.2x |
Specs and list prices
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input per 1M | $4.00 | $0.15 |
| Output per 1M | $20.00 | $0.47 |
| Cached input per 1M | $0.20 | $0.016 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 11 | 2 |
| Reasoning | always | none |
| LMArena Text | 1508 | - |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Aug 26, 2026 |
FAQ
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 20.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean).
How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?
Claude Opus 5.5: $4.00 input and $20.00 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.