Home / Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: cost per task

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 29.8x cheaper on average (geometric mean). On LMArena Text they are practically tied (1475 vs 1475, within the margin of error).

TaskClaude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question1.3¢0.09¢13.9x
Reply to a customer email0.40¢0.03¢13.1x
Write a 1,500-word blog post3.7¢0.04¢82.5x
Write 10 product descriptions4.4¢0.04¢107.0x
Translate 1,000 words2.6¢0.18¢14.3x
Proofread one page (500 words)1.1¢0.04¢25.8x
Summarize a 20-page PDF4.5¢0.12¢36.5x
Extract data from an invoice1.0¢0.04¢23.2x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet17¢0.26¢64.5x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)2.7¢0.08¢33.9x
Classify 100 support tickets0.89¢0.08¢11.1x
Review 500 lines of code8.0¢0.26¢30.1x
Write a SQL query1.1¢0.03¢34.5x
Run a 50-step coding agent84¢2.4¢35.0x

Specs and list prices

Claude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input per 1M$2.00$0.072
Output per 1M$10.00$0.14
Cached input per 1M$0.10$0.002
Context1M1M
Providers834
Reasoningalwaysdefault
LMArena Text14751475
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Sep 10, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 29.8x cheaper on average (geometric mean). On LMArena Text they are practically tied (1475 vs 1475, within the margin of error).

How much does Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost compared to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash per token?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.