Home / Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 10.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question1.3¢0.08¢16.6x
Reply to a customer email0.40¢0.04¢10.7x
Write a 1,500-word blog post3.7¢0.75¢4.9x
Write 10 product descriptions4.4¢0.76¢5.8x
Translate 1,000 words2.6¢0.08¢31.1x
Proofread one page (500 words)1.1¢0.10¢11.4x
Summarize a 20-page PDF4.5¢0.32¢13.9x
Extract data from an invoice1.0¢0.11¢9.4x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet17¢0.85¢20.2x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)2.7¢0.19¢14.2x
Classify 100 support tickets0.89¢0.42¢2.1x
Review 500 lines of code8.0¢0.83¢9.7x
Write a SQL query1.1¢0.13¢8.7x
Run a 50-step coding agent84¢9.2¢9.1x

Specs and list prices

Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$2.00$0.15
Output per 1M$10.00$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.10$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers82
Reasoningalwaysnone
LMArena Text1475-
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 10.1x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.00 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.