Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash: cost per task

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 6 of 14 tasks and about 1.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean). On LMArena Text they are practically tied (1475 vs 1474, within the margin of error).

TaskDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.09¢0.04¢2.6x
Reply to a customer email0.03¢<0.01¢4.7x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.04¢0.14¢3.1x
Write 10 product descriptions0.04¢0.14¢3.4x
Translate 1,000 words0.18¢0.21¢1.2x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.04¢0.02¢2.2x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.12¢0.10¢1.2x
Extract data from an invoice0.04¢0.02¢2.0x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.26¢0.34¢1.3x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.08¢0.06¢1.4x
Classify 100 support tickets0.08¢0.16¢2.0x
Review 500 lines of code0.26¢0.34¢1.3x
Write a SQL query0.03¢0.03¢1.0x
Run a 50-step coding agent2.4¢2.6¢1.1x

Specs and list prices

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
Input per 1M$0.072$0.048
Output per 1M$0.14$0.20
Cached input per 1M$0.002$0.006
Context1M1M
Providers3434
Reasoningdefaultalways
LMArena Text14751474
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 6 of 14 tasks and about 1.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean). On LMArena Text they are practically tied (1475 vs 1474, within the margin of error).

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to GLM 5.3 Flash per token?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output per 1M tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.048 input and $0.20 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.