Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3: cost per task

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 71.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Kimi K3 has the higher LMArena Text score (1487 vs 1475).

TaskDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3Difference
Answer a chat question0.09¢1.6¢17.8x
Reply to a customer email0.03¢4.2¢138.8x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.04¢9.2¢208.1x
Write 10 product descriptions0.04¢3.7¢88.8x
Translate 1,000 words0.18¢14¢81.3x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.04¢4.9¢115.0x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.12¢3.0¢24.5x
Extract data from an invoice0.04¢3.2¢71.2x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.26¢13¢48.3x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.08¢3.9¢48.6x
Classify 100 support tickets0.08¢8.8¢110.3x
Review 500 lines of code0.26¢11¢41.4x
Write a SQL query0.03¢3.8¢118.6x
Run a 50-step coding agent2.4¢$2.2493.2x

Specs and list prices

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3
Input per 1M$0.072$0.30
Output per 1M$0.14$11.94
Cached input per 1M$0.002$0.21
Context1M1M
Providers3426
Reasoningdefaultdefault
LMArena Text14751487
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Jul 16, 2026

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3 cheaper?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 71.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean). Kimi K3 has the higher LMArena Text score (1487 vs 1475).

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Kimi K3 per token?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output per 1M tokens. Kimi K3: $0.30 input and $11.94 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.