Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 3.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.09¢0.08¢1.2x
Reply to a customer email0.03¢0.04¢1.2x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.04¢0.75¢17.0x
Write 10 product descriptions0.04¢0.76¢18.4x
Translate 1,000 words0.18¢0.08¢2.2x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.04¢0.10¢2.3x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.12¢0.32¢2.6x
Extract data from an invoice0.04¢0.11¢2.5x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.26¢0.85¢3.2x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.08¢0.19¢2.4x
Classify 100 support tickets0.08¢0.42¢5.2x
Review 500 lines of code0.26¢0.83¢3.1x
Write a SQL query0.03¢0.13¢4.0x
Run a 50-step coding agent2.4¢9.2¢3.8x

Specs and list prices

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.072$0.15
Output per 1M$0.14$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.002$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers342
Reasoningdefaultnone
LMArena Text1475-
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 3.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.072 input and $0.14 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.