Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: cost per task

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 13.7x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GLM 5.3 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question1.3¢0.04¢35.0x
Reply to a customer email0.41¢<0.01¢63.7x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.61¢0.14¢4.4x
Write 10 product descriptions0.56¢0.14¢3.9x
Translate 1,000 words2.4¢0.21¢11.5x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.57¢0.02¢29.2x
Summarize a 20-page PDF1.3¢0.10¢12.7x
Extract data from an invoice0.60¢0.02¢26.5x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet3.5¢0.34¢10.1x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.99¢0.06¢17.2x
Classify 100 support tickets1.1¢0.16¢6.5x
Review 500 lines of code3.5¢0.34¢10.2x
Write a SQL query0.43¢0.03¢13.3x
Run a 50-step coding agent30¢2.6¢11.9x

Specs and list prices

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GLM 5.3 Flash
Input per 1M$0.66$0.048
Output per 1M$1.98$0.20
Cached input per 1M$0.022$0.006
Context1M1M
Providers2334
Reasoningdefaultalways
LMArena Text-1474
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 13.7x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cost compared to GLM 5.3 Flash per token?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: $0.66 input and $1.98 output per 1M tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.048 input and $0.20 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.