Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 4.4x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question1.3¢0.08¢16.4x
Reply to a customer email0.41¢0.04¢11.0x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.61¢0.75¢1.2x
Write 10 product descriptions0.56¢0.76¢1.4x
Translate 1,000 words2.4¢0.08¢29.4x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.57¢0.10¢5.8x
Summarize a 20-page PDF1.3¢0.32¢3.9x
Extract data from an invoice0.60¢0.11¢5.4x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet3.5¢0.85¢4.1x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.99¢0.19¢5.1x
Classify 100 support tickets1.1¢0.42¢2.5x
Review 500 lines of code3.5¢0.83¢4.2x
Write a SQL query0.43¢0.13¢3.4x
Run a 50-step coding agent30¢9.2¢3.3x

Specs and list prices

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.66$0.15
Output per 1M$1.98$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.022$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers232
Reasoningdefaultnone
LMArena Text--
ReleasedAug 12, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 12 of 14 tasks and about 4.4x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: $0.66 input and $1.98 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.