Home / Compare / GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Nano

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Nano: cost per task

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 11 of 14 tasks and about 2.2x cheaper on average (geometric mean). GLM 5.3 Flash has the higher LMArena Text score (1474 vs 1401).

TaskGLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.4 NanoDifference
Answer a chat question0.04¢0.15¢4.1x
Reply to a customer email<0.01¢0.02¢2.6x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.14¢0.30¢2.1x
Write 10 product descriptions0.14¢0.13¢1.1x
Translate 1,000 words0.21¢0.20¢1.0x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.02¢0.11¢5.6x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.10¢0.33¢3.3x
Extract data from an invoice0.02¢0.08¢3.5x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.34¢0.44¢1.3x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.06¢0.12¢2.0x
Classify 100 support tickets0.16¢0.15¢1.1x
Review 500 lines of code0.34¢0.75¢2.2x
Write a SQL query0.03¢0.10¢3.1x
Run a 50-step coding agent2.6¢8.7¢3.4x

Specs and list prices

GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.4 Nano
Input per 1M$0.048$0.20
Output per 1M$0.20$1.25
Cached input per 1M$0.006$0.02
Context1M400K
Providers344
Reasoningalwaysdefault
LMArena Text14741401
ReleasedAug 26, 2026Mar 17, 2026

FAQ

Is GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on 11 of 14 tasks and about 2.2x cheaper on average (geometric mean). GLM 5.3 Flash has the higher LMArena Text score (1474 vs 1401).

How much does GLM 5.3 Flash cost compared to GPT-5.4 Nano per token?

GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.048 input and $0.20 output per 1M tokens. GPT-5.4 Nano: $0.20 input and $1.25 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.