Home / Compare / GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 6.5x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskGLM 5.3Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.86¢0.08¢11.2x
Reply to a customer email0.13¢0.04¢3.4x
Write a 1,500-word blog post3.3¢0.75¢4.4x
Write 10 product descriptions3.4¢0.76¢4.5x
Translate 1,000 words4.9¢0.08¢59.6x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.39¢0.10¢4.0x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.97¢0.32¢3.0x
Extract data from an invoice0.50¢0.11¢4.5x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet7.7¢0.85¢9.1x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.98¢0.19¢5.1x
Classify 100 support tickets3.8¢0.42¢9.1x
Review 500 lines of code7.7¢0.83¢9.4x
Write a SQL query0.77¢0.13¢6.1x
Run a 50-step coding agent39¢9.2¢4.2x

Specs and list prices

GLM 5.3Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.079$0.15
Output per 1M$4.80$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.078$0.016
Context1M1M
Providers462
Reasoningalwaysnone
LMArena Text1478-
ReleasedAug 18, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is GLM 5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 6.5x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does GLM 5.3 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

GLM 5.3: $0.079 input and $4.80 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.