Home / Compare / GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Flash

GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on 13 of 14 tasks and about 3.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskGPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.06¢0.08¢1.3x
Reply to a customer email<0.01¢0.04¢5.1x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.12¢0.75¢6.4x
Write 10 product descriptions0.05¢0.76¢14.1x
Translate 1,000 words0.08¢0.08¢1.0x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.04¢0.10¢2.2x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.16¢0.32¢2.1x
Extract data from an invoice0.03¢0.11¢3.5x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet0.19¢0.85¢4.5x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.05¢0.19¢3.6x
Classify 100 support tickets0.06¢0.42¢6.5x
Review 500 lines of code0.31¢0.83¢2.7x
Write a SQL query0.04¢0.13¢3.1x
Run a 50-step coding agent4.1¢9.2¢2.3x

Specs and list prices

GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.10$0.15
Output per 1M$0.50$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.01$0.016
Context1.05M1M
Providers72
Reasoningdefaultnone
LMArena Text1443-
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on 13 of 14 tasks and about 3.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does GPT-6 Luna cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

GPT-6 Luna: $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.