Home / Compare / Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 10.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskGrok 4.7Qwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.96¢0.08¢12.5x
Reply to a customer email0.50¢0.04¢13.4x
Write a 1,500-word blog post2.3¢0.75¢3.0x
Write 10 product descriptions0.89¢0.76¢1.2x
Translate 1,000 words2.9¢0.08¢35.3x
Proofread one page (500 words)1.3¢0.10¢12.8x
Summarize a 20-page PDF3.4¢0.32¢10.7x
Extract data from an invoice1.1¢0.11¢10.4x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet20¢0.85¢23.6x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)1.7¢0.19¢8.6x
Classify 100 support tickets2.2¢0.42¢5.3x
Review 500 lines of code22¢0.83¢26.8x
Write a SQL query1.2¢0.13¢9.4x
Run a 50-step coding agent$1.709.2¢18.4x

Specs and list prices

Grok 4.7Qwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$2.00$0.15
Output per 1M$6.00$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.50$0.016
Context500K1M
Providers52
Reasoningalwaysnone
LMArena Text1444-
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 14 of 14 tasks and about 10.3x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Grok 4.7 cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

Grok 4.7: $2.00 input and $6.00 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.