Home / Compare / MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on 7 of 14 tasks and about 1.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.09¢0.08¢1.2x
Reply to a customer email0.06¢0.04¢1.5x
Write a 1,500-word blog post0.20¢0.75¢3.7x
Write 10 product descriptions0.16¢0.76¢4.7x
Translate 1,000 words0.57¢0.08¢6.9x
Proofread one page (500 words)0.13¢0.10¢1.3x
Summarize a 20-page PDF0.63¢0.32¢2.0x
Extract data from an invoice0.10¢0.11¢1.1x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet1.6¢0.85¢1.9x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.28¢0.19¢1.4x
Classify 100 support tickets0.23¢0.42¢1.8x
Review 500 lines of code0.44¢0.83¢1.9x
Write a SQL query0.07¢0.13¢1.7x
Run a 50-step coding agent6.5¢9.2¢1.4x

Specs and list prices

MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.43$0.15
Output per 1M$0.87$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.004$0.016
Context1.05M1M
Providers42
Reasoningnonenone
LMArena Text1479-
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on 7 of 14 tasks and about 1.0x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does MiMo-V2.6-Pro cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.