Home / Compare / Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.8 Flash: cost per task

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 13 of 14 tasks and about 5.5x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

TaskNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.8 FlashDifference
Answer a chat question0.33¢0.08¢4.3x
Reply to a customer email0.86¢0.04¢23.3x
Write a 1,500-word blog post1.9¢0.75¢2.5x
Write 10 product descriptions0.75¢0.76¢1.0x
Translate 1,000 words3.0¢0.08¢36.4x
Proofread one page (500 words)1.0¢0.10¢10.6x
Summarize a 20-page PDF1.3¢0.32¢4.1x
Extract data from an invoice0.66¢0.11¢6.0x
Analyze a 200-row spreadsheet2.8¢0.85¢3.3x
Answer from 5 retrieved documents (RAG)0.99¢0.19¢5.2x
Classify 100 support tickets1.8¢0.42¢4.4x
Review 500 lines of code2.5¢0.83¢3.0x
Write a SQL query0.76¢0.13¢6.0x
Run a 50-step coding agent67¢9.2¢7.2x

Specs and list prices

Nemotron 3 UltraQwen3.8 Flash
Input per 1M$0.60$0.15
Output per 1M$2.40$0.47
Cached input per 1M$0.12$0.016
Context262K1M
Providers52
Reasoningdefaultnone
LMArena Text1426-
ReleasedJun 4, 2026Aug 26, 2026

FAQ

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on 13 of 14 tasks and about 5.5x cheaper on average (geometric mean).

How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash per token?

Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.60 input and $2.40 output per 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.47 output. Token prices alone mislead - models use different numbers of tokens for the same task, which is what the task table shows.